WASHINGTON, D.C. Obama Embraces Economic Dadaism "Why not?" is common reaction
In the face of yet another unprecedented financial crisis, the sitting president of the United States has at last resorted to Dadaism to sort out the troubles. When asked about his new policy, Mr. Obama danced and lilted: "Ungleddodle bunglemee, maybe try this one, you see? Gebbendodder teeter-totter rescue the economy!" The president continued to gibber until the press withdrew quietly from the room.
Economists and the literati are divided on the new approach. Stephen Harrington, a professor of 20th century literature at Colombia, said "the president's new tack squares well with his concern over a 'lost generation', and has a great deal of historical precedent from the Europeans." The economics department of Colombia refused comment, as they had pasted their lips together and were assembling a colossus of books and papers held together with glue.
Treasury secretary Timothy Geithner demonstrated his solidarity with the President by sitting naked in the Rose Garden, covered head to toe in body paint, and smoking two cigarettes through his nose. When asked for comment, he screeched "smoking loon!" repeatedly for thirty seconds, then fell silent and refused to discuss further plans. Later this evening, the cabinet is expected to put on a silent play, going into detail on the new rescue plans via the media of pantomime and dance.
Reaction on Wall Street has been mixed. Henry Mitchell, a trader on the NYSE, said that he "couldn't figure out what they were up to before, so damned if this makes any difference." Oswald Harvery, a manager at Dow Jones, reported he was "thrilled that we're finally getting a consistent message from Washington."
|
|
|
|
| Posted by Mark Miner at | | | |
|
By Mark Miner
We are a cold eyed nation stone faced staring at the blaze the chaff of our burning paper spoiling the sky as we gaze into the flames of our finances
We are a quiet nation around our tables in the evening chatting lightly of suffering and woe our neighbors do the same
We are a pensive nation like children looking at the world out the window wondering where this train is headed and if we will like the people when we get there
We are a somber nation as the smoke rises slowly from each disaster searing and tearing our eyes but we do not blink
We are a young nation though the aches in our bones are of old and we collectively cup our head in our hands sighing, wondering how it became like this
Yet we are a patient nation We have been tried before and if we have our legs under us still we can rise and resume the race. By the grace of Almighty God.
|
|
|
|
| Posted by Mark Miner at | | | |
|
Logic Bomb Destroys Fannie, Freddie Washington, D.C. Mortgage Giants "Brought to their Knees"
Although Fannie and Freddie recently escaped a crippling attack on their data center, another so-called "logic bomb" has wrought ruin at all levels of the institutions. In an interview with Jim Johnson, former chairman of Fannie Mae, he divulged the troubling news.
"Anybody could have seen it coming," he said, "and nobody did anything. It just blew up on us with a big red ERROR message, and that was it."
He was referring, of course, to the logical fallacy that his organization depended on: you can spend more than you have. Mr. Johnson: "It was like this tidal wave. We'd done it that way for so long, the congress loved it, homeownership was expanding. We thought it wouldn't ever execute that line."
"That line", of course, was the command buried deep within any financial script, no matter what language it is written in, that executes a protocol known as "pay_piper.exe". When this program is called for, it attempts to settle, or at least balance, all outstanding accounts. It is also connected with the collapse of WaMu and Bear Stears.
Millions of American homeowners are expected to suffer as a result of this error, and millions more taxpayers may be required to repair the damage.
A tech writer for "Wired", speaking anonymously, confided to us that "bad structuring can totally f*** your system, but when you basically ask it to tell you that a huge negative number equals zero, you crash everything. Everything."
|
|
|
|
| Posted by Mark Miner at | | | |
|
WASHINGTON, D.C. Breaking News: Left-Leaning Establishment Propped Up By Right-Leaning Establishment "Simply a miracle"
Early Friday afternoon, on K-Street, a "miracle" occured. A prominet left-leaning think-tank began to lose stability, drifting further to the left in the brisk wind. "It just looked like it couldn't stay up much longer," said Damon Smythe, who happened to be on the sidewalk below. "I thought I would have to run for it, y'know?"
This near-calamity was averted, however, when the building next door to the left, housing a far-right-leaning advocacy group, tipped just a bit further to the right, exactly intercepting the think-tank's ivory tower. "I wanted to cry, it was so beautiful, so merciful!" Julie Snyder, another passerby, exclaimed. "It could have been this huge disaster, but by drifting just a little further to the right, those nuts really saved the day."
President Obama was quick to comment on the report. "This spirit of post-partisanship, of left and right coming together, this is why I am here today, doing what I do." The president was wearing one of his gorgeous red ties again today.
Another bystander, who wished to remain anonymous, asked "Well, what if they had been on opposite sides of each other?" He was handcuffed and lead away from the scene by the Washington police. The police spokesperson issued a brief statement, saying "We don't have room for perspectives like that in America. It's perfectly obvious that, if it had been the other way around, you would just have had to go around to the other side."
|
|
|
|
| Posted by Mark Miner at | | | |
|
By Mark Miner
Are you illegal, papa? How did you come here? I came across the deserts in the dead of night I was two days in the journey then further in the van We took back roads because they watch the interstates. Who watches them, papa? La Migra, mijo. Who are they? They are the government. If they found papa, they would have sent me away. Back to la patria. But papa, don't you love la patria? Of course, mijo. But I love you more. Is that why they don't let you work? Yes. So mama has to work, And I keep you company. Sometimes you work on the weekends, though. Yes, because that's when the gueros do projects. remember how I came home painted last weekend? Haha, yes papa, I remember. A nice man needed painters, and papa needed work. So I got forty dollars. Wow, papa. Are we poor? Yes, mijo, we are poor. Why are we poor, papa? Because papa is illegal.
|
|
|
|
| Posted by Mark Miner at | | | |
|
By Matt Miner
From today's WSJ:

You know what makes sense? Trying to drive up price as demand plummets. See, when fewer people buy your stuff, watcha' do is...Raise the price like hell! That'll show 'em - they'll buy more for sure!
Oh wait. No, actually it doesn't work like that. OPEC is being very short sighted here. If they had any sense of strategy, they would let the price fall and let the world get re-hooked on cheap energy. Also, in the current downturn, and with cheap energy, investment in renewables would pull way back as is already happening. All those smart people would go get other jobs, and we'd set this process of reducing oil demand back by at least three to five years. But instead OPEC will try to manage short-term revenue, thereby lending support to continued renewables investment. Cool, huh?
The cloud in this silver lining is as follows: The lovely countries that produce our oil (Chad, Niger, Venezuela, Iran, etc.) have an immediate finance problem. If oil goes to $40, these countries will get much poorer. Of course, in the long run, even if oil stayed at $140 but demand was cut in half, they'd still be in trouble. I will go ahead and predict that the process of weaning ourselves from oil will not be without geo-political turmoil. I also will predict that between climate change, general outrage, and the current economic woes, we've passed the tipping point on this weaning process. If OPEC really takes production way down, the shift will just accelerate.
Of course, I may be completely wrong. Check back in ten years.
|
|
|
|
| Posted by Matt Miner at | | | |
|
Hello world, It's been a while I hope you're doing well. I'm busy now With many things I bet that you could tell. Grad school apps Midterm today And work goes on and on. See you soon, I guess I'll say, I hope I won't be long.
MJM
|
|
|
|
| Posted by Mark Miner at | | | |
|
I hate politics. They invariably degenerate into power struggles between equally greedy parties or people. This year the stench of machiavellianism is particularly striking.
Don't get me wrong, I think that so far, everyone who has tried to run or is in the race, top or bottom of the ticket, is basically as personally qualified to be president as the rest of them. We are supposed to have a representative system, and there is actually a surprising diversity of the population represented on either ticket. So far, so good.
But then the mud starts to fly. Then the barbs and jibes. Then the slings and arrows. This arms race only has one end that I perceive. Whether the red button is pushed by the campaigns or by the 5th column YouTubers or the 529s, somebody's gonna go nuclear towards the end. "John McCain doesn't want to let a black man in the White House." "Barack Obama won't let a woman get anywhere close to the seat of power." And there will be the fallout and winter of the b-word. Bigot, that is.
It is such a horrid word. It is a harsh, blunt, divisive word, one best ascribed by historians with the protection of time and grave between them and their subjects. You can't say it and win. By calling someone a bigot, you draw a big black line. It doesn't matter which side of that line you are on, since you have sundered rational debate by drawing it. It is the end, and I fear it is nigh.
Why have poll gaps closed so tight in recent elections? Why has the congress been functionally deadlocked for quite some time? Why has our "conservative" president succeeded in squandering his administration, leaving a legacy of missed opportunities and bigger government? I submit that it is due to this strangling of debate that occurs when the bigot lines are drawn. There are many. So many it hurts. Why are there so many? Why do we face such a polarizing choice when flipping between Fox and CNN?
I think our national attention span has been greatly diminished. The decisions people are asked to make are "A or B, NOWNOWNOW!" What the relative merits of A or B might be will be drowned in the din of the next news story. Yesterday's Doonesbury was particularly salient.
If this sort of yellow journalism, yellow legislation, and yellow campaigning takes root, Americans will lose that once-so-defining characteristic: a nation of misfits thrown together who acheive astonishing things. Think about what you think. Consider that others may hold their beliefs equally dear. If you want to win them over, try talking, not shouting. The heritage of our nation, of eurdite lettered men conversing at length with dirt farmers about one idea or another, is in danger from the din of the demagogues.
Let's hold out.
|
|
|
|
| Posted by Mark Miner at | | | |
|
By Mark Miner
summer is dying writhing and lashing with heat will soon die and cool
winter is plotting scheming its crooked-hand plans here we mock his chill
|
|
|
|
| Posted by Mark Miner at | | | |
|
Hold fast to dreams For if dreams die Life is a broken-winged bird That cannot fly. Hold fast to dreams For when dreams go Life is a barren field Frozen with snow.
Langston Hughes
|
|
|
|
| Posted by Mark Miner at | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|